What if we could make designing chips materially cheaper? Well the first problem you have is a oligopoly with Synopsys, Cadence, and Siemens at 70% market share but even more for the most sophisticated chips at advanced nodes. One doesn’t simply design a chip unless it works with the Big3. And even if you create a new widget, they will buy you. And even if you create an even better widget, a multi-physics simulation tool with the potential to disrupt chip design through simulation, they will buy you. $35 billion for Ansys. It’s a graveyard of well intentioned startups that asked: surely, shipping hardware should be as easy as shipping software? But is this time different, does AI or as they call it in EDA, ML-EDA, present a disruptive force? Maybe. Designing chips isn’t get easier. The chips are getting smaller, they are being connected up in weird ways with chiplets, and then connected up over scale out fabric. EDA optimization is a multi-dimensional challenge. As fabrication techniques get more complex at advanced nodes and components get increasingly vertically stacked and connected up in all sorts of ways, designers are thinking in terms of systems and systems of chips, rather than at just the circuit and logic level. It’s not AI per se that is disruptive, but the shift to systems-not-chip is disruptive. The entry point for thinking about performance and cost for AI systems moves from the chip itself to the enture device and how the device interacts with another devices. This shift potentially opens up room for new EDA entrants to bring down design costs. through advanced design for manufacturability (DFM) techniques, automated design space exploration, and unified multi-physics simulation
First, advanced design for manufacturability (DFM) techniques integrated into electronic design automation (EDA) tools have the potential to significantly enhance production yield, which directly influences the overall production costs. These techniques include a range of sophisticated approaches that optimize the chip design process for more efficient and defect-free manufacturing. By using these tools, manufacturers can proactively address potential issues before fabrication begins, reducing the likelihood of costly errors that can impact the final yield.
A significant advancement in this domain involves the application of machine learning (ML) models, trained on extensive datasets capturing historical manufacturing outcomes, to predict and mitigate yield detractors during the early design phase. ML approaches, especially those leveraging deep learning architectures, have demonstrated a robust capacity to infer complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in semiconductor fabrication. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), for instance, are increasingly employed to conduct detailed analysis of physical design layouts, identifying lithographic hotspots, critical area concerns, or potential process-induced defect zones long before tape-out. By deploying such models, designers can make preemptive corrections, thus reducing risks associated with downstream failures and costly re-spins. Beyond CNNs, other advanced models such as graph neural networks (GNNs) are being explored to represent more abstract design interactions and dependencies, further enhancing predictive accuracy and robustness. This early intervention mechanism is crucial for optimizing yield, as it not only avoids expensive corrective measures but also improves overall design quality and manufacturability.
The economic benefits of integrating these advanced DFM techniques into the design process are massive. By increasing the first-pass yield from, for instance, 60% to 80%, the cost per functional die can be reduced by an estimated 25-30%. This improvement is due to the more efficient use of wafers, with fewer defective dies produced per wafer, which means that manufacturers can achieve a greater number of sellable units from each production batch. Moreover, an increased first-pass yield shortens production cycles, as fewer redesigns and re-fabrications are needed, leading to faster time-to-market, which is crucial in a competitive semiconductor landscape.
However, while the benefits are clear, there are limitations and challenges to implementing advanced DFM techniques and machine learning models effectively. One limitation is the requirement for high-quality datasets. Machine learning models are only as good as the data they are trained on, and the semiconductor manufacturing process is inherently complex, with numerous variables that need to be accurately captured and understood. The quality and diversity of training data can significantly impact the model's ability to generalize and make reliable predictions across different designs and manufacturing environments. Additionally, the integration of DFM techniques and machine learning into the EDA toolchain adds a level of complexity that requires specialized expertise. Designers must be well-versed not only in traditional design principles but also in machine learning concepts and the intricacies of manufacturing processes. This learning curve can be a barrier for some teams, requiring additional investment in training and potentially slowing down adoption rates. Furthermore, these methods also demand significant computational resources to analyze layout patterns and predict yield issues, which may present scalability challenges, especially for smaller design teams or companies with limited computational infrastructure.
Worth watching:
Automated design space exploration represents a highly promising area in chip design optimization. Traditional methods for optimizing chip architectures are often resource-intensive, requiring extensive trial-and-error processes conducted by skilled engineers over long periods. However, design space exploration tools using reinforcement learning algorithms and fast surrogate models, offer a faster and automated improvement.
These tools have the ability to autonomously analyze and evaluate thousands, if not millions, of design configurations in a fraction of the time. By simultaneously optimizing across multiple key parameters—such as power consumption, performance, area (PPA), and cost—these systems can rapidly identify superior design solutions that would otherwise take months to achieve. In particular, the reinforcement learning algorithms learn from past iterations, progressively improving their accuracy and ability to propose better design options. This learning-based approach is significantly more efficient compared to manual or traditional automated techniques, which often rely on exhaustive search methods that don't leverage previous outcomes as effectively.
One of the most significant benefits of these intelligent tools is the reduction in the overall design cycle. What used to take several months and require extensive human involvement can now be shortened to mere weeks. This acceleration not only reduces expensive engineering labor but also enables companies to bring products to market more quickly, which is crucial in the highly competitive semiconductor industry. Additionally, by reducing time-to-market, companies can iterate on designs more frequently, allowing for rapid innovation and the ability to stay ahead of technological trends.
However, there are limitations. While reinforcement learning and surrogate modeling can significantly enhance the efficiency of design space exploration, these systems are only as good as the models they are based on. If the surrogate models lack fidelity or fail to capture critical nuances in the chip architecture, the optimization results may be suboptimal or even misleading. Furthermore, the initial setup and integration of these tools into existing design workflows can require a high level of expertise in machine learning and system modeling, posing a challenge for organizations without such capabilities. Additionally, while the promise of reducing engineering hours is attractive, the transition to automated tools does not eliminate the need for expert oversight. Engineers will still be required to interpret the results, fine-tune the designs based on real-world constraints, and ensure that the models are correctly validated against physical implementations.
Worth watching: